TOW #25 - Review/Film; Disney's 'Beauty and the Beast'

As the new version of Beauty and the Beast just came out in theatres, I thought it would be quite interesting to look at review of when the original movie came out in the 90s. In the Review/Film; Disney's 'Beauty and the Beast', Janet Maslin strongly admires the movie as a step forward in the Disney company.  Janet Maslin is an American journalist that is best known for her film and literary critic for The New York Times. In this review, she aims for an audience of many ages, and specifically to convince people to go and see the magic happen.  In this article, Maslin utilizes descriptive diction in order to illustrate diction in the reader’s head, and key background knowledge of the subject, which helps establish her purpose in getting people out to go see this movie.

Throughout the article, Maslin is able use descriptive, and romantic diction which helps to paint a picture in the reader’s head.  In the beginning she says, “No live-action musical could ever match the miracles of anthropomorphism that occur here, or the fantastically sweeping scale. Nor could a live-action work achieve this mixture of elaborate, painstaking technique and perfect simplicity” (Maslin). By using words such as ‘elaborate’, ‘painstaking’ and even ‘anthropomorphism’, she is able to establish her dictions for the rest of the text, truly showing just how visually appealing and great this movie really is.  Without her diction, the article would lack any sort persuasion to get people to see the movie.  Maslin is also able to bring background knowledge about Disney as a company.  She says, “With "Beauty and the Beast," a tender, seamless and even more ambitious film than its predecessor, Disney has done something no one has done before: combine the latest computer animation techniques with the best of Broadway” (Maslin).  By including information about the past years of Disney she is proving to her audience that she truly does know what she is talking about, and has lots of experience in the subject.  This strengthens her ethos and truly qualifies her opinion as something worth listening to and taking into consideration.

In my opinion, I believe Maslin successfully conveyed her purpose in both a simplistic and sophisticated way.  It was interesting to see varying opinions as compared to the original movie and the 2017 version.  I thought that this article would be very fitting as the new version did just come out.  I actually truly enjoy Janet Maslin’s writing and plan on reading more articles by her.

http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE2DF1330F930A25752C1A967958260

TOW #24 - Sully

In his autobiography Sully, Chesley B. “Sully” Sullenberger III writes about his life leading up to the emergency landing of Flight 1549 in 2009. Sully discusses the ways that these events have affected his life. In the beginning pages of his book, Sully introduces that he has always had a lifelong interest in aviation. He pursued his passion and served as a member of the US Air-Force and a professional commercial pilot. As per the dedication page, “Sully” wrote this autobiography for people that were affected by Flight 1549 as a means of remaining connected, In the beginning as well, he also writes that this book serves as a method of finding what really matters, and valuing the most important things to you in your own life.  This message is continued throughout the second half of the book, when the actual climax of the story happens where the plane crashes.

To reveal this very important message and life lesson, Sullenberger is able to include actual pictures pertaining to the specific event, and passionate dictions to include emotional appeal to the readers.  The pictures he includes are of the actual plane in the Hudson River, as well as pictures of the crew members at ceremonies and even of his wife and kids (Sullenberger 228). The inclusion of these pictures helps the reader to connect on an emotional level through displaying what the author finds important, which can make a reader begin to think of people and things that they value as well. Adding to the emotional appeal, Sullenberger utilized passionate diction,  He says “Just as I completely love Lorrie, Kate, and Kelly, I will never shake my love of flying. Never” (Sullenberger 315). Even though Sullenberger was close to death, and was close killing nearly a few dozen passengers, he still holds his passion and love for flying.  That takes a lot of courage and intellectually discipline. This quote is an attempt at showing the readers that you should never give up on the people and aspects of your life that you truly care, value, and love.  Even though you face hardships in life that should never stop you from loving and caring.  This was quite a deep, and underlying lesson for a plane-crash story.  

Although I fully agree with Sullenberger’s message, I didn’t enjoy the book too much,  I felt that it was decently long for a story that didn’t really span out to be 200+ pages.  I was interested in the story at first when it came out in the news, and was very glad to learn more about it. But it was just a little bit too long and a little bit boring.

TOW #22 - Review: Ed Sheeran’s Secret Weapon on ‘Divide’? Being Unabashedly Uncool

In Jon Caramanica’s review titled, Ed Sheeran’s Secret Weapon on ‘Divide’? Being Unabashedly Uncool, he reveals his opinion of Ed Sheeran.  That very opinion is how great Ed Sheeran is by revealing the many different genres and topics he uses in his new album while still maintaining his popularity in music. This article was published a few days after Ed Sheeran’s Grammy Awards performance, which indeed was phenomenal.  Throughout the article, Caramanica utilizes diction relating to music, and similes that are very exaggerated in order to show his positive review of Ed’s new album and just Ed Sheeran as an artist.

In the beginning of the article, Caramanica says,  “This is an album which, including bonus tracks, features rapping and singing; club music and orchestras; a tin whistle and a bodhran, hallmarks of Irish folk; and a song partly in the Ghanaian dialect Twi.” Through the use of the specific words pertaining to music, he is able to establish ethos in his argument.  This then allows for his argument to be justified.  In essence, it then proves how Ed Sheeran does indeed include various genres of music in his new album. Caramanica is also able to incorporate similes in his argument.  When talking about the topics Ed Sheeran cover son his album, he says, “For someone so skilled at pop simulation, Mr. Sheeran rigorously maintains his position of outsiderdom, especially in his lyrics: He paints himself as a pinball bounced around by larger societal forces, and by women who casually slap him with a flipper.” By using the idea and exaggeration of a pinball, Caramanica is able to prove just how different Ed Sheeran is but the varying topics in his lyrics.

In my opinion, I believe that Caramanica successfully proves his argument and review of Ed Sheeran’s new album and just him as an artist.  I agree with all of Caramanica’s point in the sense that it is absolutely mind blowing how someone like Ed Sheeran can incorporate so many different ideas into an album while still maintaining his popularity.  It is actually quite interesting because at least we have pop artists that are bringing some different ideas to the table.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/arts/music/ed-sheeran-divide-review.html

TOW #21 - What The United States Has Fought For

During the late 19th century leading into the early 20th century, American imperialism was on a rise. The idea of American imperialism, caused one of the largest debates in American history; the anti-imperialists versus the pro-imperialists.  Although there was lots of tension, this showed the pure and true effects of democracy by allowing a multitude of different opinions to disperse in the nation.  This cartoon titled, “What The United States Fought For”, justifies the reasons for imperializing lands like the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, and Isthmus of Panama.  The artist of this cartoon is clearly on the side of pro-imperialism and geared toward an audience of pro-imperialists. The use of symbolism and parallelism is quite evident in an attempt to justify American Imperialism.

The symbolism is seen as the different lands being shown as people. Each person on the top is holding some sort of ‘baggage’ or weight that is holding them down. For example, the Philippines is holding a box titled Spanish oppression, and Hawaii is holding a sack that says industrial slavery, and so on. The use of symbolism in this sense creates a dramatic effect of change that America helped in doing so.  The change from a weak, suffering, and tired person to a business person, is clearly quite huge, which is able to be seen through this symbolism.

Parallelism is also huge in this political cartoon.  Social Darwinism was very popular during this time period of American Imperialism, which played a huge role in the history of the United States of America. On the bottom half of the cartoon it shows the final stage of the lands, through the help of America.  These people (symbolic of the specific land) are changed into strong, wealthy, and proud businessmen. This is direct parallelism to the idea of Social Darwinism in the sense that America thought that the only way to really survive was to become strong and wealth and quite literally “Captains of Industry”.  The push for “survival of the fittest” played a huge part in American imperialism, and to some, justified the actions that happened during imperialism.

In my opinion I believe that the artist successfully proved their point by laying out both a sophisticated and unique argument. Although, I disagree with pro-imperialists and would probably side with anti-imperialists, this does not alter my view on the artist's effective use of rhetorical strategies in order to prove a point.